Turn communication chaos into review-ready case material.
JANUS starts with employment and workplace investigations. It structures fragmented WhatsApp, email, Teams or Slack, SMS, screenshots and related records into source-linked material for faster, more disciplined professional review.
JANUS supports case preparation. It does not determine facts, credibility, intent, misconduct or legal liability.
Design validation · seeking a small number of professional pilot partners
09:12 · Email
Employee requests written reasons.
09:18 · Teams
Manager asks to move the exchange to a call.
What goes in, what comes out.
A structured report designed for review, not a black-box conclusion.
WhatsApp, SMS, Teams and Slack exports.
Threads, forwards and attachments referenced in the record.
Captured fragments, with capture limits marked.
Grievance correspondence, notes and process documents.
Who said what, when, in what sequence, with source references.
Relevant excerpts linked to source and surrounding context.
Messages grouped by the questions that matter in the matter, with what supports or contests a reading and what is missing.
Individual communication actions recorded against defined coding rules.
Reported only where recurrence or structured development is supported across multiple relevant units, sequences or episodes.
Observable changes in frequency, timing, channel, demands, participants, formality or institutional stakes, including de-escalation. Tone alone is not an evidential criterion.
Provenance, source references, reviewer actions, corrections, uncertainty and missing-context markers.
Uncertainty, alternative readings and stated analytical limits.
How JANUS works.
Five stages, designed so a human reviewer stays in the loop at every step.
Scope the communication material.
Define the sources, date range, participants and review question. Pilot material is transferred only through an agreed intake process, never through the public demo form.
Prepare the material for structured review.
Formats, timestamps, speakers, duplicates and source references are normalised without altering the underlying record. Every file keeps a fingerprint of the original.
Build the chronology.
Messages are arranged into a readable timeline with source references, preserving order, timing and channel.
Record candidate communication actions.
Candidate actions and response forms are recorded under defined coding rules. A human reviewer accepts, rejects, revises or marks each observation as uncertain.
Produce review-ready output.
A source-linked chronology, quote bank, issue map, functional observations, any supported multi-episode pattern review, escalation map and evidence-hygiene notes.
Case material handled with restraint.
Hosted in the EU
The workspace runs on dedicated infrastructure in Germany, with encryption of stored source files and access limited to named team members.
Pseudonymised before AI
Names, contact details and other identifiers are replaced on our own server before any AI assistance is used. The identity key is stored separately with restricted access.
Approved by a person
The pseudonymised version of every file is checked and approved by a person before it can be used for AI assistance. Case data is not used to train models.
Independent review
Designated findings need two independent, blind reviews. Disagreements go to a named lead expert reviewer and stay visible.
Pilot arrangements, including processing agreements, retention and deletion, are agreed in writing before any real material is used.
A report you can inspect.
A short synthetic matter, shown the way a reviewer receives it. Every tab stays source-linked and states its analytical limit.
Analytical limit: order and timing as supplied. Messages outside the exported range are not shown and are not assumed to be absent.
“That will need to go through the right channel now.”
SRC-022 · context SRC-021 (HR copied in shortly before).
Analytical limit: every quotation is checked character for character against the source; paraphrase is never presented as a quote.
Relevant: SRC-014, SRC-021. Supports a reading of repeated requests; contested by nothing in the record. Missing: the content of the call.
Relevant: SRC-015, SRC-022. Alternative: a call may be ordinary for a sensitive topic.
Relevant: SRC-021, SRC-022. Missing: any HR response inside the exported range.
Analytical limit: themes organise the record for review; they are not findings.
Channel-shift request following a written-record request.
Analysis level: linked reply sequence · source SRC-015 · context SRC-014. Alternative explanation: a call may simply be quicker. Reviewer decision: accepted, with note.
Analytical limit: describes what the move does in the exchange, not why it was made.
- SRC-014 Request for written reasons.
- SRC-015 Proposed change of channel.
- SRC-021 Request repeated; new participant (HR) added.
- SRC-022 Reference to formal process.
Analytical limit: observable changes in channel, participants and formality only. No overall score is assigned to any person.
Source reference, timestamp, file fingerprint, manual corrections, reviewer actions, uncertainty and missing-context markers, and the export identifier of every report.
Analytical limit: the trail records what was done; it does not certify the authenticity of the original export.
A full report is shown during a scheduled workflow demo.
Who JANUS is for.
JANUS is being developed for communication-heavy grievances, harassment and discrimination matters, whistleblowing concerns, internal investigations and tribunal preparation.
Employment law boutiques
Communication-heavy disputes involving long email chains, messages, screenshots, grievances, disclosures and changing workplace narratives.
Workplace investigators
Matters requiring chronology, source-anchored excerpts, issue mapping and a transparent reviewer trail.
Internal investigation teams
Early structuring of fragmented communication records before professional findings or decisions are made.
Structure, not verdicts.
JANUS structures the communication record for professional review. It does not detect, establish or prove harassment, discrimination, misconduct or any other matter, and it does not determine facts, credibility, intent or legal liability. It is AI-assisted and human-reviewed, never autonomous. Signals, functional observations and codes are review aids, not conclusions.
Request a workflow demo.
Tell us what professional workflow you are exploring and the approximate type and volume of communication involved. No case files are required. We typically respond within 1–2 business days.